Propaganda Channel



Dominic Lawson is spot on in this assessment of the dire fare on offer at Russia Today (RT) which is really a propaganda channel, a cheerleader for the government of Vladimir Putin.

Now I would interested in watching some serious reporting about what's going on in Russia today, but every time I switch on RT I end up laughing out loud at the amateurish and one-sided nature of its programmes.

Fair and balanced it is not, although worse than that it's not remotely believable or entertaining.  


This is Russia Today, bringing you no news at all about, er, Russia


By Dominic Lawson - The Sunday Times


IT IS hard to establish just how much the Russian people are robbed and impoverished by the system of bribes and gangsterism that characterises their domestic economy. It would be a good subject for an investigative news station. Perhaps one called Russia Today. But RT, as it is known these days, is funded by the Kremlin, whose occupant Vladimir Putin is at the apex of that system and has been efficiently strangling the independent media in Russia.

What RT has just done is to start 30 hours a week of “exclusive” British news coverage on its existing channel with a UK broadcasting licence. This, it claimed, would be “slicing through the rampant corruption that stalks through public and private sector alike”. British rampant corruption, that is: the sort that, if you prove it, will earn you prizes at black-tie journalism awards dinners rather than a bullet in the back of the head.

Who is the main presenter of this cutting-edge investigative work? Bill Dod. This — you may not know — is someone who used to present regional programmes for what is now ITV Anglia (think Alan Partridge) before going into “corporate television”. That is where those who leave mainstream broadcasters sometimes end up to keep paying the mortgage, making programmes funded entirely by businesses wanting to push their message. And now it’s the Kremlin paying Dod to present its line. This is not so crude as simply to say that everything in the Russian garden is rosy. The point, rather, will be to demonstrate how dismal things are in the channel’s host country. Frankly, we in the British media do a pretty good job of this already, but every now and then we do slip in a good-news story about the UK.

That’s where RT will be a breath of fouler-smelling air. Don’t expect the slightest respite from a diet of unremitting sourness. On the first day of this allegedly “new” station (actually it’s just a rebranded version of the existing output) the main stories on its website were “Psychopaths to maintain order after massive nuke attack — Home Office docs”, “UK police slammed for using anti-terror laws to uncover secret sources”, “British aid money funding corruption overseas” and “Brits genetically programmed to be grumpy”. All these were in fact repackaged versions of gloomy stories already served up by British newspapers.

Where RT offers something truly different — to judge from its record to date — is in giving wider currency to some of the conspiracy theories that the Kremlin uses, or even originates, to create confusion and demoralisation in the West. For example, its Spanish version floated the idea that ebola might be the product of a CIA experiment gone wrong.

This is a 21st-century tweak on one of the most successful KGB disinformation campaigns, Operation Infektion, which spread the idea that the CIA had created Aids. The campaign’s main purpose was to stir up hostility towards US military bases, which were portrayed as the cause of Aids outbreaks in the local population. In fact it was the Russians who were infecting what we might term the information biosphere, which can also have fatal consequences: Thabo Mbeki, the Moscow-indoctrinated former South African president, refused to accept the true causes of the disease, resulting in countless more avoidable deaths from the disease among his countrymen.

Nowadays, with social media and the internet, such information viruses can be spread much more rapidly. Thus immediately after the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over territory held by Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine, the Kremlin used its media outlets to give wider currency to bizarre conspiracy theories; one of them was that the bodies that had fallen out of the sky from MH17 were not victims of the rebels (who had already shot down Ukrainian military transport planes) but bloodless corpses collected for this purpose by anti-Russian forces from the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 that had disappeared months earlier.

The fact that such “stories” can be believed by only the most abjectly credulous of conspiracy theorists is not a problem for the Kremlin. The point is to muddy the informational waters and create a sense of confusion where otherwise the awkward truth would be seen more clearly. This is what is really intended by the RT slogan“Question more”.

Unlike in the days of the KGB (Putin’s erstwhile employer), the Russian propaganda effort is not designed to suggest an alternative form of government to the West. Instead it just seeks to exploit existing disenchantment with the established political parties, which is why Putin seems so popular with the far right in Europe and even America, among whom the Russian president’s anti-homosexual legislation is seen as especially attractive.

Yet some on the left simultaneously buy the idea that Putin is in the vanguard of “anti-fascism”, reflexively accepting Kremlin propaganda that Kiev is under the control of “neo-Nazis”. One such is that faithful apologist for Stalinism, Seumas Milne of The Guardian. Last week the newspaper published his article extolling Putin’s Russia as “a global necessity” to counter American power, which had recently been “justifying dictatorship over people and countries”. As Milne noted, these were Putin’s words, spoken before foreign journalists and academics in “a session I chaired”.

Clearly Milne is one mainstream British journalist Putin felt he could depend upon. It made me think nostalgically of Richard Gott, who 20 years ago resigned from The Guardian after The Spectator (which I then edited) revealed that he had been paid “expenses” by the KGB for various journalistic services. I hope Milne made sure that his trip to Russia was paid for by The Guardian rather than the Kremlin, if only for appearances’ sake.

Milne wrote, almost wistfully, of the fact that when the Soviet Union was around, America had “respect for power”. Of course that is exactly what Putin wants to restore — and in the grand old Russian tradition that “respect” is meant to be synonymous with fear. Unfortunately for the Kremlin, while military adventurism in Crimea and Ukraine does create fear, it is a poor substitute for economic strength.

The reason the Soviet Union collapsed was not that America “won the Cold War” — a myth propagated by the Pentagon, among others — but that its economy imploded. The final blow was the oil glut of the 1980s, leading to falling crude prices (it was the world’s largest producer). Now, something similar may be happening again.

That is why I am less agitated than some by the RT phenomenon: it too presents itself as uniquely influential — “the only major UK news broadcaster headquartered near the corridors of power . . . the views from our studio reach directly to the City of London and the corporate power of Canary Wharf” — when in fact it is a media minnow. According to the latest figures from the Broadcasting Audience Research Board, RT in the UK has a daily audience of less than 90,000: such obscure channels as Zing, Viva and Rishtey are more popular.

So when I called Ofcom to ask if it holds RT to the standards that it expects from broadcasters such as the BBC, the watchdog’s official remarked that “we do take into account the nature of its audience”.

Sorry, Bill Dod, you were bigger news at Anglia — and more innocently employed making corporate television.

dominic.lawson@sunday-times.co.uk



Russia in the Dock (23 July 2014)



In November 2006 Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian agent, met with two former colleagues, Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitri Kovtun, in London.

A few days later he was admitted into hospital suffering from poisoning, but not just any old poisoning because somehow he had ingested radioactive Polonium 210 which finally killed him 22 days later - with the poison being traced back to a teapot in the London hotel where he had shared a cup of tea with his fellow countrymen from Russia.

Suspicious, damning even, or what?

Because it's not everyone, of course, who has ready access to a highly volatile, dangerous radioactive isotope and the ability to administer such a deadly substance to an 'enemy' they intended to kill, without being anywhere near the scene of the crime when their deadly deed finally came to light. 

So it's great news that Marina Litvinenko has been granted the public inquiry that her husband's terrible murder deserves, as explained in the following report from the BBC.  


Alexander Litvinenko death: UK announces public inquiry




A public inquiry will be held into the death of the Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko, the UK Home Secretary Theresa May has announced.

Mr Litvinenko, a former KGB officer who became a British citizen, died in 2006 in a London hospital after he was poisoned with radioactive polonium.

The investigation will examine whether the Russian state was behind his death.

Mr Litvinenko's widow, Marina, said she was "relieved and delighted", saying the "truth will win out in the end".

Announcing the inquiry - which will be chaired by senior judge Sir Robert Owen - Mrs May said she hoped it would be of "some comfort" to Mrs Litvinenko.

The former Russian spy, 43, died after he was poisoned with radioactive polonium while drinking tea with two Russian men, one a former KGB officer, at a London hotel.

His family believes he was working for MI6 at the time of his death and was killed on the orders of the Kremlin.

'For truth'

Speaking at a press conference, Mrs Litvinenko - who had legally challenged the government's earlier decision not to hold a public inquiry - said she had pursued the case "for justice", adding: "I did this for truth."

"I would like to be able to show people that you are able to get justice, in any difficult situation," she added.

But she added that she did not believe the suspects would face trial in the UK.

One of the suspects, Andrei Lugovoi, told the Russian Interfax news agency the decision to launch an inquiry was "the height of cynicism".

In May 2007, the UK said Mr Lugovoi - now a politician in Russia - should be charged with the murder of Mr Litvinenko. Russia refused to extradite Mr Lugovoi, who denies any involvement.

The inquiry will seek to establish how Mr Litvinenko died and where the responsibility for his death lies. It will also have powers to make recommendations.

The government had previously resisted calls for a public inquiry, saying it would first "wait and see" what a judge-led inquest found.

However, Sir Robert - who was the coroner overseeing Mr Litvinenko's inquest last year and will now chair the inquiry - called for a public inquiry to be set up.

In a written ruling, he said an inquest could not take sensitive evidence due to national security fears. As a result any verdict would be "potentially misleading and unfair", he said.

As the law stands, inquests cannot consider some material relating to national security because of rules preventing its public disclosure.

The inquiry will be able to be mostly held in public but have closed sessions to consider sensitive evidence.

In February - following a legal challenge by Mrs Litvinenko - the High Court said the Home Office had been wrong to rule out an inquiry before the outcome of an inquest.


Analysis from BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera

Until now, the government has steadfastly resisted holding a public inquiry.

That was because there are layers of secrets surrounding the death of Alexander Litvinenko. This is thought to include secret intelligence that may relate to whether the Russian state was responsible for his murder.

There are also secrets about Mr Litvinenko's own relationship with MI6. The government demanded all these secrets be kept out of an inquest.

But the former Russian security officer's widow has fought a long legal battle to get to the truth.

A public inquiry will now look at where responsibility lies for the death although it does not look as if it will look at whether his relationship with MI6 means that more should be done to have protected him.

Lawyers for Mrs Litvinenko had claimed that the issue of state responsibility was being closed down precisely to try to improve relations with Russia.

If so, then changing times may explain a government's change of heart. And so we may get one step closer to finding out who was behind a radioactive murder on the streets of London.


A Downing Street spokesman said Sir Robert would have the jurisdiction to demand the production of both witnesses - including security agents - and documents from the security and intelligence services.

However, the inquiry will have no such powers in relation to evidence from Russia, he added.

The inquiry is due to begin on 31 July and is expected to conclude by the end of 2015.

A government spokesman said Mr Litvinenko's death was "an appalling crime and we want to see those responsible prosecuted through the courts".


The Litvinenko case

  • 1 Nov 2006 - Alexander Litvinenko has tea with former agents Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitri Kovtun in London
  • 4 Nov 2006 - After three days of vomiting he is admitted to hospital, and dies 22 days later. His death is attributed to radiation poisoning
  • May 2007 - The UK decides Mr Lugovoi should be charged with the murder of Mr Litvinenko. He denies any involvement but says Mr Litvinenko was a British spy
  • 5 Jul 2007 - Russia officially refuses to extradite Mr Lugovoi, prompting a diplomatic row
  • 20 Sept 2012 - Pre-inquest review hears that Russia's links to the death will be probed
  • May-June 2013 - Inquest into Mr Litvinenko's death delayed as coroner decides a public inquiry would be preferable
  • Jan 2014 - Marina Litvinenko in High Court fight to force a public inquiry
  • 11 Feb 2014 - High Court says the Home Office had been wrong to rule out an inquiry before the outcome of an inquest

Russian Games (12 February 2014)


I'm not sure that it will do much good, but Marina Litvinenko, the  widow of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, has won a major court victory which means that government ministers will have to think again about holding a public inquiry into his death. 

Whatever the UK might do Russia has already given the main suspect, Andrei Lugovoi, immunity from prosecution and extradition by making him a deputy in the Russian Duma or Parliament.

So, a public inquiry will only tells us what we already know while having no powers to bring those responsible to justice.

All the same you have to admire the determination of Marina Litvinenko to keep the issue in the public eye - and I wish her well in her campaign. 


Spooks and Spies (6 July 2013)

I was rather surprised by the recent announcement that Eric Snowden, the former  American 'spook', is seeking political asylum in - wait for it - freedom loving Russia.


Now I can quite accept that America does not always live up to its billing as the 'land of the free and the brave' .

But the last time I looked Russia was playing fast and loose with its constitution to allow Vladimir Putin a third term as President, operating virtually as a one party state, passing legislation that openly discriminates against gay people - and murdering exiled dissidents like Alexander Litvinenko.

And with exquisite timing along comes another scandal from Germany - which just goes to show that to a greater or lesser extent many of the most powerful nations in the world are snooping and spying on each other all the time.

In Germany a married couple - Andreas (54) and Heidrun (48) Anschlag - were jailed earlier this week after spying for Russia for more than two decades - during which they lived a quiet suburban life having entered Germany in 1988 via South America on false Austrian passports. 
  
Andreas and Heidrun (real names Sasaha and Olga) were passing information to Russian handlers - their espionage activities included making a payment of 72,000 Euros to a Dutch diplomat for top secret EU information on Georgia and details of NATO operations in Libya and Afghanistan.

Sasha was caught 'red-handed' (pardon the pun) while sending a short wave radio transmission to his Russian handlers whose private thoughts about modern Germany were worryingly hostile - describing it as the 'land of the enemy'.

Now wonder Angela Merkel gave Vladimir Putin a good kicking during her recent state visit to Russia - but it just goes to show how naïve spooks and spies can be, if Eric Snowden's bizarre choice of an adopted homeland is anything to go by.   

For their part the Russians don't seem too keen to welcome him with open arms - which can only mean that they have plenty of work for their home grown agents - at the moment anyway.


Safe Havens (16 July 2013)

While the former American spook, Eric Snowden, is thinking about seeking political asylum in Russia I wonder if he might like to raise the curious case of Alexander Litvinenko - with his new comrades and friends.

Now I'm sure that Alexander Litvinenko became a useful source of information to British intelligence handlers - a 'spy' in the very broadest sense of that word - but in no way could he have been regarded as an on-going threat to Russian security.

Yet he was murdered by consuming radioactive Polonium shortly after taking tea with two former Russian intelligence agents in a London hotel - an act which could only have been organised by a very sophisticated state machine with a motive to kill a Russian defector.

So Russia looks like a very unpromising place for an American spy to call his new home from home - although this is a very murky world where things are not necessarily as reliable or believable as they would first appear.

Andrew Lugovoi has since become a Russian MP, of course, which makes it unlawful for the Russian authorities even to consider extraditing him to the UK - where he is wanted for questioning in connection with a cowardly and vile murder plot.

Here's a little history of the Litvinenko case which I came across on the BBC web site - I can't say I'm surprised that the Government has decided not to proceed with a public inquiry.

Because what would that tell us other than it is almost certainly the case that Russia and its intelligence services - were responsible for Alexander Litvinenko's untimely and unnatural death. 

The Litvinenko case
  • 1 Nov 2006 - Alexander Litvinenko has tea with former agents Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitri Kovtun in London
  • 4 Nov 2006 - After three days of vomiting he is admitted to hospital, and dies 22 days later. His death is attributed to radiation poisoning
  • May 2007 - The UK decides Mr Lugovoi should be charged with the murder of Mr Litvinenko. He denies any involvement but says Mr Litvinenko was a British spy
  • 5 Jul 2007 - Russia officially refuses to extradite Mr Lugovoi, prompting a diplomatic row
  • 20 Sept 2012 - Pre-inquest review hears that Russia's links to the death will be probed
  • May-June 2013 - Inquest into Mr Litvinenko's death delayed as coroner decides a public inquiry would be preferable

Popular posts from this blog

SNP - Conspiracy of Silence

LGB Rights - Hijacked By Intolerant Zealots!